Fast food restaurants form a guild: a group of potentially competing species; sympatric, utilizing the same resource, similar in morphology and behavior
similar "adaptive syndrome"
similar resource requirements -- $$;
They function as filter feeders: they are sessile and draw in potential resource-holding particles from the environment
survival and RS limited by ability to gather resources
Under these conditions (niche overlap) we expect interspecific competition
and manifestations of it
Manifestations of competition:
Niche partitioning or character displacement
major axis of diversification: "feeding niche" = menu offerings
five major thrusts of adaptation (adaptive radiation)
a) hamburger generalists
b) sandwich generalists
c) chicken specialists
d) tex-mex specialists
e) seafood specialists
clear separation in menu offerings especially among latter three species groups
high overlap however within these types, relatively low species diversity
high overlap among hamburger and sandwich generalists --
but also high species diversity
this is a paradox -- how can this occur
Arbys is a sandwich specialist --
no burgers, relatively few kinds of sandwiches
narrow "niche breadth", relatively low overlap with other species
Hardees and Jack-in-the-Box are hamburger/sandwich generalists --
high overlap with each other and with hamburger generalists
these species tend to be allopatric. overlap is too high to permit
coexistence
competitive exclusion, local extinction
second manifestation: actual active competition
The big three: MCD, BK, WEN: hamburger generalists -- high overlap
a) several things are happening in this species group
began (phylogenetically -- see later) as hamburger specialists with
niche breadth restriction
we are now in a rebound phase of menu broadening and diversification;
this is an attempt to gather resources away from their competitors
ie: breakfasts, salads, sandwiches, chicken nuggets (parts is
parts)
ie: mcrib, chicken fajita, burger buddies
Wendy's has diversified more than MCD and BK:
less overlap with them so less potential for competition
? perhaps resources are not limiting; there are plenty of dollars to go around
probably never true under the conditions that exist today
high species diversity and large population sizes of ffrs mean
great demand for resources
ffrs also must share resources with other types of restaurants
RS of ffrs directly related to resource gathering ability
with high overlap and resource limitation, we expect species to
compete
What are the burger places (MCD and BK) doing?
scant data on these two:
NUMBER OF FRANCHISES
McDonald's 8901
Burger King 4225
REVENUES (in millions)
McD 3761
BK 1410
PROFITS
McD 433 (11.5%)
BK 221 (15.7%)
ADVERTISING
McD 686 (18.2%)
BK 251 (17.8%)
an extremely large proportion of total resources accumulated goes to main competitive activity
we as resource bearing units are inundated with attempts to lure
us in
There is niche partitioning and also active competition in this guild
What is the phylogenetic history of the fast food restaurant guild?
The common ancestor of the ffrs was the hamburger stand:
"primitive" characteristics:
broad menu, no inside seating, carhop service
relict populations can still be found: del rancho, colemans
The next step: hamburger specialist drive in:
relatively narrow menu, but other characters primitive: no inside
seating, carhop service
sonic is a species that resembles this ancestral state
Selection pressures on this ancestor:
Post WWII, large increase in population size of resource units, large increase in mobility, decrease in time for meal preparation: working parents
From hamburger drive-in generalist: Hamburger specialist:
This was a crucial step in the adaptive radiation of FFRs:
The first McDonalds opened in San Bernardino CA in 1948; bought out/franchised by Ray Kroc in 1954, second McD opened in Des Plaines, IL 1955, mushroomed from there
From hamburger specialist, a large adaptive radiation occurred through niche partitioning and specialization, "species packing", which led to current species diversity of ffrs.
Competition acts to affect the number and kind of species that exist
in a community. Increases species diversity through adaptive evolution,
divergent evolution to avoid niche overlap among sympatric, phylogenetically
closely related species.