History 335, Writing Instructions and Materials



You will be writing three papers for Hist 335. Each one will take a different form. Short descriptions follow, as do some general points on how they should be written. Also, all papers will be turned in via Turnitin.com



Finding a topic for your projects

Please consult with me to okay your topic for each paper. You may do this via Zoom or just talking to me in person.

We will talk about choosing topics in class, but ultimately, for the Bio and the Short Research Paper, you will have to be proactive and find a good topic within our subject area of Europe, 1939-present. You must choose a topic that offers much in the way of both primary and secondary source materials. This is CRUCIAL. Hence, you will need to consult with me either by email or direct discussion. To do this, use your own knowledge, look ahead in the syllabus, chat with me after class etc.

The topic must be focused and narrow: NOT "Adenauer and Germany" but rather a specific aspect, like "Adenauer and the Herrenchiemsee Conference: Building the West German Constitution."

Journals you could check to see what kind of scope scholarly History research articles cover:

Central European History
French Historical Studies
The English Historical Journal
The Historical Journal
German History
The Journal of Modern History
The Journal of Contemporary History
Austrian History Yearbook

JSTOR is your friend. Let me know if you need an introduction to this source for scholarly journal articles.



The first paper will be a Documentary Exercise.

    This assignment is an exercise in choosing, editing, and introducing a historical document.  The assignment requires you first to find a suitable primary document, that is, a first-hand historical source, such as a letter, an eyewitness account, an autobiography, a diplomatic document, a contemporary pamphlet, etc.  The document must pertain to European History in the period we are studying.  You must okay the document with me before you try to do the assignment.
            Next, you will want to study the document to make sure you know what it means, to what events or matters it refers, what knowledge it assumes, to whom or for whom it was written, and any other elements which would assist you in drawing on the document for historical knowledge.
            You will then annotate the document, that is, get a clean copy and choose a number of spots in the paper which require elucidation to make sense to the average educated reader.  This might be a really archaic word (but look it up to make sure it is archaic. The Oxford English Dictionary will tell you that). It could be a first name (e.g.--"Freddie told me yesterday that the French were massing troops in Alsace"--find out who Freddie was an add the note: Freddie was Home Office official Archibald Frederick Portswaddle).  It could be a foreign word or sentence--translate it clearly however you can. It could be an unusual or technical phrase: "We are all working hard here at the stope-face"--explain this.  Etc. Etc.
    Choose a section with 15 or more such points. You must annotate consecutively; that is, in the section of your document you choose to annotate, don't skip anything that need annotating.  If you can’t find what something refers to, give that a number and say, “I  tried to find this and couldn’t.” 
    On the copy, mark those spots with a superscript, and write an endnote or footnote which supplies the information necessary to make it intelligible. Don't just restate or explain. Add information, enough to help the average reader make sense of the document.
    Each annotation should include the source or sources which you used to write the footnote.  These sources must be solid sources, not of the anonymous internet type. You may of course use Wikipedia to help you figure it out, but you must find solid sources which confirm your Wikipedia info.
            Finally, write a short (700-800-word) introduction which will serve to introduce the document to the general reader, put it into its historical context, and perhaps point out interesting or useful points about the document.  You should use at least three solid sources as a basis for this Intro.  No anonymous internet sources may be among your three.
            Put the whole package together:  title page (no page number--and the first page of text is page 1), introduction, the annotated document (with numbered superscripts marked on the xerox), and the corresponding explanatory notes, typed consecutively.
            You should either choose a document which will require at least 15 notes or simply use an excerpt of some longer document.  In other words, don't just pick and choose the spots for annotation:  annotate everything that you think needs it.
            You should create footnotes for the citations you used for the Intro, then list the endnotes for the annotation separately.
                  In your introduction, DO NOT USE INTERNAL CITATION SUCH AS MLA STYLE.  All references should be in the footnote/endnote style.  Please see the following site for a complete description of footnote style:
 
http://www.wisc.edu/writing/Handbook/DocChicago.html



Annotated Bibliography

First, if you do not already use a digital bibliographic program on your computer, look at the page for a bibliography program called Zotero.
        https://www.zotero.org/
Download it for free. It can be used for any discipline, but it was written by and for historians at George Mason University.  I recommend it highly. It is very flexible, and it will make your life easier.


              *  *  *  *  *  *

This will be a full-fledged Annotated Bibliography. It should look like this in outline:

Cover page
Introduction to the topic (two solid paragraphs)
Bibliography
        Primary Documents
        Secondary Documents
    (divided by these headings)
Conclusion (short paragraph summing up the topic as shaped by the sources you list)


Each entry in either category must include full bibliographical information in The Chicago Manual of Style format for "Notes and Bibliography." The Chicago Manual of Style is reflected and explained in many sites on the internet, but the simplest reference page is the one maintained by The Chicago Manual of Style itself:
https://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org/tools_citationguide/citation-guide-1.html

Annotations:  After each bibliographical entry, you must write a short annotation of 3 or 4 lines in length, explaining how this source supports the understanding of the topic you have chosen. There is no set format for these annotations, but after perusing (not necessarily reading thoroughly) all your documents, you should be able to form some idea of how each might help in telling the story and doing the analysis you intend to do.


In your Annotated Bibliography, you must tell me how your primary sources make the study possible in the conclusion or in the annotations themselves.

How many sources?  There is no one answer. For some topics you might have a list of a dozen primary and a dozen secondary sources. For some, you could write a paper based on many fewer. But one way or another, your bibliography must contain some solid primary sources and several secondary sources.  This does not count encyclopedia entries (unless you are using one of the specialized historical encyclopedias in the reference section of Abell Library--those are good historical secondary sources, usually).  Internet sources MUST be taken from legitimate, clearly acceptable sites.  You MUST give full information for internet sources, including author, organization, URL, date, etc.  If any of these items is unavailable, then you may not use it as a source for your paper.





The Short Research Paper

The paper should have have a clear introduction, including a "Fragestellung," as we will be discussing in class.  There should also be a clear, summary conclusion.  The audience is History students and scholars.  The paper should be in the range of 2700   words of text.

Think of the framework this way:

Introduction

Body
        Section I
        Section II
        Section III
Conclusion
Bibliography

The paper should focus on a narrow, enclosed topic that allows you to dig in and analyze a trend, event, person, episode, etc.  Beware of a topic that is too broad.  If you can envision a book on the library shelf about the topic you are thinking of, then you should narrow it down drastically. Consult with me before you go too far with a topic. I can help you avoid projects that are too broad or otherwise too difficult.

As for the writing itself, we will discuss systems for writing larger research papers, and you must discuss with me what system you will be using. 

            The Finished Paper

The paper should have title page and bibliography, but not an annotated one.  The bibliography must be works you actually used in the footnotes of your paper.

Please note: you must write footnotes or endnotes in correct form for the evidence in your paper. We will look at examples in class.

Please note that the actual form of the bibliography entries is different from footnote references. 

Don't Forget to Number Your Pages.  The first page of your paper is the first page of text,  NOT the title page.

You should run spell check.  And you should proofread several times.  Mechanical and writing matters will be factored into the grade, for good and bad. 

You must turn in it in via Turnitin.com.

  DO NOT USE AN INTERNAL CITATION SYSTEM SUCH AS MLA STYLE
  All references should be in the footnote/endnote style.  Apart from The Chicago Manual of Style page given above, you can also look at the following sites for a complete description of footnote and bibliography style:

http://www.wisc.edu/writing/Handbook/DocChicago.html

http://www.press.uchicago.edu/books/turabian/turabian_citationguide.html

Please NOTE:  bibliography entries are not arranged in the same order and with the same punctuation as footnote references.

     Plagiarism is so easy with electronic sources, that I want to make clear my stance on it. If you simply rewrite slightly some source you found on the internet (or in print for that matter), that constitutes plagiarism.  If I discover this, you will receive an F for this course, and I will report the case to the Dean and the appropriate conduct committees.  But whatever the conduct committee decides, you will still receive the F.  I may not catch all cases of plagiarism, but I promise to give immediate and full attention to those I do.  Give full credit for an idea, for any information that goes beyond common knowledge, for someone's words, for someone's brainchild, etc.  Otherwise you are being dishonest.  

Other Important Issues: 

--ALWAYS number your pages.  Don't turn in anything to anybody that looks half-baked. 
--In quoting, remember to TAG or attribute your quotations in the text:  don't just rely on the footnote to give that information to the reader. 
--You can make your writing strongly immediately by revising out all the verbs in the passive voice and most of the uses of the verb to be.  
--Please see the "Exam and Evaluation Sheet" which I use to help me mark papers and tests a bit faster and give you an idea of what kinds of issues might come up.  This will give you some idea of what sorts of things to look for --when you do your own revising.



FINALLY...

With both papers, after you have gotten your paper back with comments and a grade, you may choose to edit the paper and turn it in again.  If so, I will average the edited version grade with the research paper grade.






























The second paper will be a Research Bibliography.

This a detailed bibliography on a specific topic.

    Choose the topic in consultation with me.

    The only real text will be a paragraph of introduction. The bibliography must include both primary and secondary sources. It must be fairly extensive: let's say at least 4 primary and 10 secondary sources. Choose the topic in consultation with me.  You must divide the sources into primary and secondary. You should annotate each entry by saying something about how this source contributes to your study of the topic--just a sentence or two, right after the citation.

 



The third paper will be a Research Essay of at least 2400 words.  [Instructions coming]




GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR ALL PAPERS

You may not use Wikipedia or any other internet source whose author and date we don't know. I would certainly use Wikipedia as a launching point, but your sources must be published sources, either hard copy or firm, vouched-for journal articles (such as those you find on JSTOR), or clearly solid academic sites which publish material whose authors and dates are given.

ALWAYS double-space your whole paper. 

All papers should be turned in via Turnitin.com

All papers should have a cover sheet, but the cover sheet is NOT page one.  Page one (which should not have a number actually on it) is the first page of text.

You must use proper English and complete sentences.   DO NOT USE INTERNAL CITATION SUCH AS MLA STYLE.  All references, if you use any for this assignment, should be in the footnote/endnote style.  Please see the following site for a complete description of footnote style:

http://www.wisc.edu/writing/Handbook/DocChicago.html

Another site--better in some ways, not as good in others--is excellent in laying out the note style for internet-based sources:

http://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org/tools_citationguide.html
     
(NOTE ON PLAGIARISM:  Plagiarism is so easy with electronic sources, that I want to make clear my stance on it. If you simply rewrite slightly some source you found on the internet (or in print for that matter), that constitutes plagiarism.  If I discover this, you will receive an F for this course, and I will report the case to the Dean and the appropriate conduct organs.   I may not catch all cases of plagiarism, but I promise to give immediate and full attention to those I do.  Give full credit for an idea, for any information that goes beyond common knowledge, for someone's words, for someone's brainchild, etc.  Otherwise you are being dishonest. )
 
Other Important Issues:
    ALWAYS number your pages.  Don't turn in anything to anybody that looks half-baked.
    In quoting, remember to TAG or attribute your quotations in the text:  don't just rely on the footnote to give that information to the reader.
    You can make your writing strongly immediately by revising out all the verbs in the passive voice and most of the uses of the verb to be. 

For some detailed ideas about what sort of level I am looking at for your writing, please take a look at my

Exam and Term Paper Evaluation Sheet