Chapter II from The Code of Law
of 1649
(Ulozhenie)
Chapter
II The Sovereign's Honour, and How to Guard His Health
1. Should anyone think maliciously about the
Sovereign's health, and should another person report him
concerning this malicious thought, there should be made an
inquiry into his malicious thought and intended action against
his Tsarist Majesty, and such person, upon investigation,
should be executed.
2. Likewise, should a member of his Tsarist
Majesty's government wish to seize control of the Muscovite
state and become Sovereign, and should he, to attain this evil
goal, organise an army or conspire with the enemies of his
Tsarist Majesty, issue charters, or aid them in any way, in
order to seize control of the Muscovite state or do some other
foolish thing with the aid of those enemies of the Sovereign,
and should someone report him, there should be organised a
proper inquiry into his treason, and such a traitor should be
sentenced to death.
3. And should anyone give away a city of his
Tsarist Majesty to an enemy through treason, or accept
foreigners into cities of his Tsarist Majesty for treasonous
purposes, and then investigation be conducted into it, such
traitors should be executed.
4. And should anyone consciously and
treacherously burn either a city or manors, and then be
apprehended during his act or afterwards, and an inquiry be
conducted into his evil act, such person should be burned
mercilessly.
5. Service estates, hereditary estates, and
livestock of all traitors should be transferred to the
possession of the Sovereign,
6. Wives and children of traitors, if they were
aware of their treasons, should be executed.
7. If a wife knew nothing of the treason of her
husband, or children of the treason of their father, and if
this be verified by an investigation, such persons should be
neither executed not punished; the Sovereign will determine
how much of the service and hereditary estates they should be
allowed to retain for their livelihood.
8. If a traitor had children, but they, prior to
his treason, were separated from him, did not live with him,
and hence knew nothing of his treason, and if they had their
own livestock and their own hereditary estates, from such
children neither livestock nor hereditary estates should be
confiscated.
9. And if someone should commit treason and leave
[as survivors) in the Muscovite state either his father, or
his mother, or his brothers, or his cousins, or his uncles, or
any other member of his family, and if he lived with them and
they jointly owned their livestock and their hereditary
estates, such traitor should be thoroughly investigated in
order to determine whether his father, or his mother, or his
relatives knew of his treason. Should an investigation
determine that they knew of his treason, they should be
executed and their livestock and hereditary and service
estates transferred to the Sovereign.
10. If, however, an investigation should
determine that they knew nothing of the treason of the
traitor, they should not be executed and their livestock and
their service and hereditary estates should not be
confiscated.
11. If a traitor should return from a foreign
country to the Muscovite state, and if the Sovereign should
pardon him and forgive his guilty action, and then if he
should obtain a new service estate through service, the
Sovereign may return his old hereditary estate to him, but he
cannot grant him his old service estate.
12. If someone should report that another person
has revealed a great state secret, but he does not have
witnesses to substantiate his report, does not convince anyone
[with his arguments), and no evidence exists to aid in the
investigation into the revelation of state secrets, a decree
should be issued on this problem, following an inquiry, as the
Sovereign should direct.
13. And if someone should reveal the state of the
Sovereign's health, or if they should disclose information
about people whom they serve, or, if they be peasants, to whom
they belong, and if such reports are not convincing, they
should not be believed. After they have been severely punished
for spreading lies, through merciless whipping with a knut,
such individuals should then be returned to those persons to
whom they belong. Such informers should not be believed or
listened to in the future on anything except matters of great
importance.
14. And should anyone, regardless of his status,
say that he is a government official, and then should it be
determined that he is not, such person should be knuted
for impersonating a government official, and afterwards he
should be returned to those persons to whom he belongs.
15. And if someone apprehends a traitor on the
road, and either kills him or captures him and returns him to
the Sovereign, that traitor should [In the latter case] be
executed, and the person who apprehended or killed him should
be given the livestock of the traitor as the Sovereign should
decree.
16. And whoever should report that another person
had revealed state secrets or was about to commit treason, and
the person who had been reported on is absent at the time,
that person must be found and he must confront the accuser
face to face. If a thorough investigation should verify the
validity of the charge, a decree should be issued as
stipulated above.
17. If a person should report that another is
about to reveal state secrets or to commit treason, and then
fail to prove it, and if an investigation should determine
that he fabricated his evidence, such an informer should be
punished in the same manner that the person who had been
reported upon would have been punished if he had been found
guilty.
18. Should a person in the Muscovite state,
regardless of his social status, learn of the existence of
mass discontent, or conspiracy, or any other evil design, [in
Moscow] the existence of such plots should be reported either
to Aleksei Mikhailovich, the Sovereign Tsar and Grand Prince
of All Russia, or to his boiars or his high
assistants, or [in the provinces), to local voevodas
or other officials of the central government.
19. If someone should know or hear of the
existence of mass discontent or a conspiracy or any other evil
design against his Tsarist Majesty, but fails to report it
either to the Sovereign, or his boiars, or his
high assistants, or voevodas, or other officials
of the central government in provincial cities, and then the
Sovereign should find out that that person was aware of the
existence of such action but failed to report it, and an
inquiry be conducted into it, such persons should be sentenced
to death without mercy.
20. During an insurrection, mass discontent, or
conspiracy, no one should break into, or rob, or inflict
bodily harm on his Tsarist Majesty, his boyars, his high
assistants, members of the boiarskaia duma [Council
of Notables], his advisers, his voevodas in
regiments, and other officials in provincial cities.
21. Whoever should initiate mass discontent or a
conspiracy against his Tsarist Majesty or his boiars,
or his high assistants, or members of the boiarskaia
duma or his advisers, or voevodas in
regiments, or other officials of the central government in
provincial cities, and pillage or inflict bodily harm on them,
those persons who initiate it should be condemned to death
without mercy.
22. Should voevodas of regiments or
officials of the central government in provincial cities
inform the Sovereign that either service people or people of
other classes had approached them in numbers resembling mass
discontent or a conspiracy and threatened to kill them, and if
those people who had been reported on should petition the
Sovereign to investigate those voevodas and
officials of the central government and deny that they had
approached them with any mass discontent or a conspiracy and
say that they came only in small numbers to petition them,
upon such petition of the Sovereign a thorough investigation
should be conducted of those city officials and, in the
regiments, of the military personnel. If this investigation in
cities and regiments should determine that these people really
came to the voevodas and to the officials of the
central government with genuine petitions and not for robbery
purposes [as it had been reported], such people should not be
sentenced to death. Those voevodas and officials
of the central government who erroneously reported to the Tsar
should be severely punished as the Tsar may determine.